The Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between McGill and SSMU is a formal contract governing their relationship, dictating issues such as the SSMU’s ability to collect student fees, use McGill’s name, and access campus spaces. Under Article 10 of the agreement, either party may terminate the relationship, provided a mediation process is undertaken first. The current MOA, signed in 2022 and set to expire in 2027, has now been called into question due to what McGill administration views as SSMU’s failure to disassociate from activist groups. In the aforementioned email, Interim Deputy Provost Angela Campbell wrote that “SSMU allowed and, at least tacitly, supported a three-day strike that further divided a campus community already deeply cleaved and hurting,” referencing incidents during the April strike that the administration described as disruptive and unsafe.

The university’s decision came shortly after the end of the student strike. Endorsed by Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR), the strike was enacted through a motion passed at the March 27 Special General Assembly, where students voted in favor of divestment and public solidarity with Palestinians. Throughout the strike period, students organized picket lines, teach-ins, and demonstrations.

While many of these events were peaceful, some rallies brought demonstrable acts of violence and the obstruction of classes.  The administration cited an incident involving vandalism in the James Administration Building as an example of unacceptable behaviour. In an email addressed to all McGill students, Interim Deputy Provost Angela Campbell wrote that the strike created “a campus environment in which dozens of classes were blocked or interrupted.” She claimed that the university’s “goal is not to silence dissent, but to affirm that all students—whatever their identity or politics—deserve to live, learn, and express themselves on a campus freedom of fear, harassment, or violence, where their dignity is respected.”

In response to McGill’s notice of termination, Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights McGill (SPHR) – though not an SSMU-affiliated organization – issued a statement accusing the university of “attacking student democracy.” In an Instagram post on April 7, SPHR wrote: “McGill has once again attacked the pro-Palestine student movement, intending to crack down on democratic forms of protest like a strike.” They described the decision as a “strategy of extortion” and a response to “pressure from Zionist donors and our warmongering political class.” The group called on the SSMU to refuse further concessions during negotiations and to “stand firmly with Palestine and our democratically enforced demand for divestment.”

In a statement issued to the McGill Daily, SSMU President Dymetri Taylor reassured that organizational “operations are normal,” noting that SSMU-affiliated clubs, services, and staff employment will remain unaffected during mediation. Taylor emphasized SSMU’s commitment to advocacy and the democratic representation of its undergraduate constituency.

One senator from the Arts Undergraduate Society (AUS) also weighed in on McGill’s decision. Anzhu Wei, who attended the GA and supported the motion, called the university’s termination of the MOA “ridiculous,”  adding that students are being punished for their political beliefs.

The termination of the MOA places the future of SSMU in limbo. Without the agreement, SSMU could lose the right to collect fees, occupy space in the University Centre, and coordinate student services in their current capacity, per Taylor’s statement. Campbell stated that the university remains “fully committed to ensuring that students continue to have strong, democratic representation and uninterrupted access to critical services.” Still, for students, the structure of that future representation remains unclear.

According to McGill’s public letter, the university will enter mediation with SSMU within two weeks of the termination letter. Until June, both parties will attempt to resolve the conflict, with the possibility of renewing or restructuring their agreement.

As the mediation process begins, SSMU has committed to transparency and regular updates. Students are encouraged to follow SSMU’s social media platforms and official channels for developments. Campbell similarly assured students the University would “keep [them] informed as we navigate this process.” In the meantime, McGill students continue to express concern over the long-term implications of the termination.

SSMU’s ability to function as an independent student union, manage funding, and maintain club spaces depends on the resolution of this process. As such, both the administration and student leadership face a critical moment in reshaping undergraduate representation at the university. McGill’s decision to suspend its agreement with SSMU signals a new and uncertain chapter in campus governance. What began as a student-led strike has sparked a broader reckoning over the limits of protest and student power.

The Daily reached out to McGill’s media relations team to provide comment on the administration’s rationale regarding the termination, how it perceives its relationship with SSMU, as well as what they expect from the negotiations. As of publishing, McGill has not given the Daily a response.

The post McGill Terminates Agreement with SSMU Following Pro-Palestinian Student Strike appeared first on The McGill Daily.

On March 3, 2025, two Palestinian members of the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) submitted a motion calling for a Special Strike General Assembly (SGA) to deliberate on initiating a student strike in support of Palestinian liberation. This motion was accompanied by a petition garnering 52 signatures from students across various faculties, meeting the constitutional requirements set forth in Article 13.2 of the SSMU Constitution. Article 13.2 mandates that for a Special General Assembly to be convened, a written request must be submitted by at least 50 members representing a minimum of four different faculties or schools, with no more than 50 per cent of the signatories from any single faculty.  Upon satisfying these criteria, the SSMU scheduled the SGA for Thursday, March 27.

The motion received significant backing from campus organizations, notably Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR) McGill. SPHR actively promoted the initiative, urging students to participate in the SGA and support the strike motion. Their endorsement emphasized the urgency of addressing the university’s affiliations and investments perceived to be complicit in actions against Palestinian communities. In preparation for the strike, SPHR continues to post support resources for activists, emphasizing that “in every historic example of divestment, prolonged mass student mobilization was essential to success.” 

The proposed strike motion outlined three central objectives:

• First, it calls on McGill University to divest from companies involved in weapons manufacturing and operations within Israeli-occupied territories; including but not limited to Lockheed Martin, Airbus, Textron, and Thales. Further, the strike would emphasize the need to reexamine financial entanglements deemed complicit in human rights violations.
• Second, it advocates for academic disruption through a temporary cessation of classes, intended as a material and symbolic act of protest to draw campus-wide attention to the Palestinian cause.
• Third, the motion demands institutional accountability, urging the administration to sever ties with entities implicated in the oppression of Palestinian communities. Additionally, the strike would put pressure on McGill to stop disciplinary action against students mobilizing for Palestinian rights. 

The March 27 General Assembly saw hundreds of students pack into the SSMU Cafeteria, reaching the maximum in-person capacity of 300, while over 400 more joined online through Zoom. The energy in the room was charged in in  a mix of tension, urgency, and collective determination. Students lined up at microphones to speak passionately for and against the motion, debating the implications, logistics, and symbolism of striking. Discussion featured both emotional appeals and procedural interventions, reflecting the deep engagement of attendees. While many voiced unequivocal support for the motion, both the principles and practices of the strike were debated. In the end, the motion passed by a significant majority,, with 679 SSMU members voting in favouur. 

The motion outlines that the strike is intended as an act of protest against the university’s perceived complicity in the oppression of Palestinians. It specifically demands that McGill University divest from companies involved in the occupation of Palestinian territories and the manufacturing of arms. The motion further calls for the disruption of regular academic activity to raise awareness and foster solidarity. During the strike, undergraduate students are asked not to attend class: however, students may still submit assignments online and attend scheduled exams. During class time, students are urged to participate in strike-related programming. These include information sessions, picket lines, and artistic interventions meant to mobilize broader campus dialogue and public visibility. 

Statements from organizers emphasized the urgency of collective action. During the GA, attendees cited recent developments in Gaza and longstanding student organizing traditions as motivators for their involvement. Members of SPHR and others expressed that this strike would not only be about Palestine, but also about confronting institutional complicity and reclaiming agency as students within university governance.

Speaker and organizer Rama Al Malah expressed the urgency of the motion, introducing the strike as part of a continuous effort for Palestinian liberation. “We know this is the will of the students, and we will strike and continue to fight for our people no matter what,” she shared in an emotional address to the crowd. 

Although the motion ultimately passed, the discussion at the GA reflected a range of conflicting student opinions. Some attendees voiced apprehension over academic consequences for students, while opposing parties challenged the effectiveness of the strike motion. Procedural debates arose around how to balance democratic participation with accessibility in a hybrid setting. 

“The atmosphere at the GA was full of hope — the entire room was buzzing with energy when I walked in. After the motion passed almost unanimously, everyone erupted into cheers and applause,” a student in attendance shared on the spirit of the event. 

SPHR’s framing of the strike echoed similar calls made during past student mobilizations at McGill, including anti-tuition hike protests and campaigns for fossil fuel divestment. Most notably, McGill students organized a pro-Palestinian encampment in 2024 that lasted several months, featuring teach-ins and cultural programming in what students called a “liberated zone” on campus. The encampment called for university divestment from companies tied to Israel’s military operations and drew national media attention before being dismantled. 

The McGill strike also arrives amid a broader wave of student-led activism across Montreal. Just one day prior, on March 26, around 200 students from Dawson College staged a walkout and marched to Concordia University as part of a coordinated day of action for Palestine, reinforcing a city-wide momentum for solidarity movements. This follows an emergency protest for Palestine on March 18, where hundreds of activists took to the streets and organized in front of the U.S. Consulate after Israel resumed its aggression on Gaza.

As of now, no public statement has been issued by the McGill administration or faculty associations regarding the motion or strike.  According to the motion, students are encouraged to participate in events relating to Palestinian liberation and refrain from attending classes. SPHR and supporting organizers are expected to coordinate teach-ins, community-building sessions, and peaceful demonstrations on campus, facilitated by SSMU. While the motion outlines no formal penalties for students who do not participate, it emphasizes the symbolic power of mass mobilization. Further details regarding event schedules, accommodations, and outreach will be shared on social media platforms in the days ahead.

This moment represents a significant chapter in McGill’s long legacy of student activism. “It is the students who steer us towards truth and justice,” Al Malah stated during the presentation of the strike motion. “We learned from history that students have the power to force the hands of our political class and administration that divestment is possible.” The passage of the strike motion underscores a renewed student interest in global solidarity and institutional accountability. With a resounding turnout and a mandate to act, McGill undergraduates have made clear that their vision of education extends beyond the classroom, and is rooted in justice, equity, and meaningful global engagement.

Whether or not the strike achieves its concrete demands, it has already galvanized a generation of students into collective consciousness and participation. As the strike approaches, all eyes are on what unfolds next — and on how student voices continue to shape the university’s stance in an increasingly politicized global landscape.

The post McGill on Strike: Student Solidarity for Palestine appeared first on The McGill Daily.

Now in its third season, The White Lotus has taken viewers from the pristine beaches of Hawaii (Season 1) to the dramatic Sicilian coastline (Season 2), and now to the lush landscapes of Thailand (Season 3). The latest season began airing on February 16, 2025, with new episodes releasing every Sunday at 9 PM (ET/PT) on HBO. Currently, the series is at Episode 5, with the next installment set to drop on March 23. This season will run for a total of eight episodes, continuing its tradition of intrigue, satire, and biting social commentary.

At first glance, The White Lotus is structured like a classic whodunit. Each season opens with a body, then rewinds to the events leading up to the inevitable demise. But where traditional murder mysteries focus on the crime itself, creator Mike White uses the structure as a backdrop for something far more sinister: the slow, inevitable unraveling of the ultra-privileged.

The show lays bare the absurdity of extreme wealth: not just in its excess, but in how its characters navigate the world. Their entitlement, transactional relationships, and petty betrayals are on full display, wrapped in a glossy vacation package. Unlike Succession, which invites audiences to revel in the messiness of the rich, The White Lotus asks us to laugh at them, cringe with them, and recognize the emptiness behind their curated lifestyles.

Part of what makes The White Lotus so watchable is its visual appeal. The sprawling resorts, the infinity pools, the effortless linen ensembles. It’s aspirational, even as it satirizes the very people who can afford it. Shows that explore wealth with a critical eye (Triangle of Sadness, The Menu, and others) have been gaining traction, and The White Lotus fits neatly into this cultural moment, where audiences are both fascinated by and repulsed by extreme privilege.

Yet, the show isn’t just about money. It’s also about power. And in The White Lotus, power is a closed loop. The wealthy stumble, they scheme, they self-destruct, but they rarely suffer any real consequences. The resort staff, the locals, the ones who exist outside the bubble of privilege? They’re the ones left picking up the pieces. It’s a brutal, but effective, reminder that no matter how much drama unfolds, the system remains intact.

Tourism serves as the show’s most biting critique. Season 1 explores tensions between wealthy tourists and Hawaiian locals. Season 2 layers in European colonial history, using Sicily’s grand architecture as a backdrop for modern exploitation. Now, with Season 3 set in Thailand, the show delves into Western tourism’s impact on local cultures, highlighting the unseen costs of luxury travel.

It challenges viewers to think: What are these vacations really about? Escape? Reinvention? Or just another indulgence that leaves locals to deal with the aftermath?

A major factor in The White Lotus’s success is its ability to blend established talent with breakout stars. Season 3 has drawn special attention with the acting debut of Lisa from BLACKPINK, a landmark moment for K-pop fans. The Thai-set season has also introduced new A-list talent, reinforcing the show’s ability to generate buzz both in Hollywood and internationally.

Meanwhile, Season 2, set in Italy, remains a fan favorite, with many considering it the best season so far. A significant reason? Theo James. His performance as the effortlessly charming, yet deeply toxic, Cameron had audiences both fascinated and (let’s be honest) thirsting for more. His role, along with the season’s layered exploration of relationships and power dynamics, solidified its reputation as The White Lotus at its peak.

Beyond wealth, The White Lotus masterfully unpacks relationships — romantic, familial, and otherwise. Whether it’s a Gen Z heiress debating social justice with her parents in Season 1, or a betrayed wife plotting revenge in Season 2, the show revels in exposing manipulation, delusion, and shifting power dynamics.

It also skewers gender and sexual politics. The men — ranging from rich boomers to insecure finance bros — wield power in both overt and insidious ways. Meanwhile, the women — some cunning, some naive, some desperately trying to outmaneuver the game — struggle within cycles of expectation. The White Lotus offers no easy answers, but it does make one thing clear: even in paradise, power imbalances remain, and no one escapes unscathed.

In the end, The White Lotus is more than just a beautifully shot, impeccably acted prestige drama. It’s a conversation starter. It forces audiences to confront uncomfortable truths about class, privilege, and the fantasies we buy into about happiness and morality. And yet, somehow, it remains wildly entertaining.As Season 3 continues, one thing is certain: We’ll keep watching, analyzing, and debating every twist, character arc, and ridiculously lavish hotel suite. Because in The White Lotus, the only thing more intoxicating than wealth is the mess it leaves behind.

The post The White Lotus and the Spectacle of Privilege appeared first on The McGill Daily.

This decision follows public consultations on homelessness and social cohabitation in Montreal conducted by the Office de consultation publique de Montral (OCPM) in mid-February. These consultations underscored the complexity of addressing homelessness and emphasized the need for diversified, long-term solutions. Participants highlighted that there is no universal solution to these issues and recommended developing resources adapted to various needs, such as shelters accommodating couples, individuals with pets, and those exhibiting disruptive behaviors, to ensure better social integration and support for vulnerable populations. The STM claims the.new measure is meant to “balance the needs of all metro users” and “ensure stations remain accessible for transit purposes.” They have also cited safety concerns and increasing incidents of overcrowding in metro stations, particularly during colder months.

Advocacy groups have strongly condemned the move, arguing that it effectively displaces some of the city’s most vulnerable residents without offering viable alternatives. Québec solidaire called on Legault to urge churches and community organizations to step in to provide additional shelter, but critics argue that relying on religious institutions is an inadequate systemic solution.

Indigenous community advocates have pointed out that the number of unhoused Indigenous people in Montreal is rising, a population which faces disproportionate struggles due to inadequate shelter resources and policing practices. Many activists argue that instead of displacement, Montreal needs long-term solutions, including more funding for shelters, transitional housing, and wraparound social services: comprehensive support programs that address multiple needs at once, such as mental health care, addiction treatment, job assistance, and case management to help individuals reintegrate into stable housing.

The STM’s policy has reignited a city-wide debate: should public spaces be made more accessible to unhoused populations, or should other solutions be prioritized? As criticism mounts, the STM has yet to announce any plans to revise the policy or introduce alternative solutions for unhoused individuals who seek refuge in the metro. Advocacy groups continue to call for emergency measures to support the city’s unhoused population, stressing that access to shelter remains a year-round issue. The debate over public space and homelessness in Montreal is far from over, with pressure on the city and the STM to provide meaningful solutions rather than temporary deterrents

The post Nowhere to Go: STM Cracks Down on Homelessness appeared first on The McGill Daily.

Major policy achievements during Trudeau’s run, which started in 2015, included legalizing cannabis, implementing a national carbon pricing policy, and negotiating key bi- and trilateral trade agreements like the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). His government also rolled out social programs such as the Canada Child Benefit and a national childcare program designed to lift children out of poverty and make early education more affordable. However, his leadership was not without controversy. Approval ratings at home plummeted as inflation surged, a housing crisis emerged, and divisions within the party broke out. Meanwhile, economic tensions inched higher after Trump slapped a 25 per cent tariff on Canadian imports that led to a tit-for-tat response by Trudeau’s government. These woes, in addition to increasing public dissatisfaction, ultimately forced Trudeau to step aside, providing an opportunity for the Liberal Party to relaunch under new management.

But for all the gravity of his leaving, Trudeau’s final moments in office were not without a trademark touch of levity. An image of him walking out of Parliament on March 10, 2025 — with the chair under one arm and his tongue stuck out in jest — caught the public eye in a candid moment. Some considered the moment a testament to Trudeau’s charm and relatability; others saw it as emblematic of his occasionally overly relaxed style of leadership. It was, in any case, an apt distillation of his tenure: a leader who mixed serious governance with personal and sometimes idiosyncratic style.

As Trudeau steps aside, Carney presents a very different leadership profile. As the only person to have served as the Governor of the central banks of two G7 countries, he is historically placed as an eminent economist. During the 2008 financial crisis, his strong actions as Bank of Canada governor — cutting interest rates and keeping liquidity flowing — helped Canada recover more quickly than most of its peers. He was appointed Governor of the Bank of England in 2013 and worked swiftly to calm financial markets during the turbulence around Brexit. Now, in his capacity as prime minister, Carney’s crisis management experience is widely seen as an invaluable asset for confronting domestic and international economic challenges alike.

His elevation to Liberal leader wasn’t only a matter of his own credentials but also a response to Canada’s political moment. The Liberal Party’s choice to favor a technocrat over a politician in the traditional sense signifies an embrace of the data-driven, expert-based form of governance. Public mood has also been critical — Canadians are searching for a leader who can offer financial stability and long-term economic growth amid continuing trade disputes and signs of economic turbulence. Carney’s non-partisan credentials and crisis-tested leadership provide some comfort, but with no prior experience in or proximity to politics, doubts about how he’ll approach coalition-building, public engagement and legislative negotiations have arisen.

Carney’s influence in shaping Canada’s global role, as well as its standing within the Liberal Party, is widely expected to be significant. His economic pragmatism and emphasis on fiscal responsibility have the potential to alter the party’s focus and, some fear, may redirect it toward more moderate policies. North of the border, his steadfast commitment to defending Canada’s sovereignty, from external pressures — particularly from the US — is a clear signal of where he intends to go on issues of economic independence and diversification. His dream of diversifying Canada’s trade relationships beyond the United States may lead the country to engage more with the European Union and other global markets as alternative partners to reduce dependence on a single market.

Carney immediately inherits complex and urgent problems as he takes office. The paramount of these concerns is an increasingly aggressive trade conflict with the US that has weighed down Canada’s export-sensitive economy. Trump’s tariffs have spurred domestic economic uncertainty, raising calls for tougher negotiation tactics and trade diversification. In addition to outside pressures, Carney will have to confront internal economic issues, such as poor growth, inflation, and housing affordability. While Carney aligns ideologically with the Liberal Party, his reputation as a policy expert rather than a seasoned politician suggests he may need time to adapt to the dynamics of political life, build public support, and manage internal party challenges.

On the eve of his departure from politics, Trudeau addressed the nation, sharing his thoughts on his time in office and the strength of Canadians while calling on the people to stay true to democracy and unity. “I am so proud of Canadians. I’m proud to have served a country full of people who stand up for what’s right, rise to every occasion, and always have each other’s backs when it matters most,” he said in his farewell message. His comments highlighted the importance of solidarity and collaboration going forward under a new government.

The switch from Trudeau to Carney marks one of the most massive political turnovers in modern Canadian history. It represents a clear break from personality-driven leadership to an emphasis on economic expertise and crisis management. Although Carney is well-respected for the financial skills he developed in previous jobs, his capability to govern and engage with the public remains to be seen. With a new governing season upon us in Canada, observers are listening closely with good reason, eager to see if his tenure on the driver’s seat can usher in economic stability, reinvigorate national sovereignty, and guide us smoothly through the trials and tribulations of both domestic and international politics.

The post From Trudeau to Carney: Canada’s New Political Era appeared first on The McGill Daily.

What is a situationship?

The word itself is a modern invention, but the concept is nothing new. A situationship is essentially a romantic or sexual relationship that lacks clear labels, expectations, or commitments. It exists in the grey area between friendship and official partnership — something that feels like a relationship, but doesn’t come with the same level of commitment. Unlike the classic “talking stage,” which is supposed to progress into something more, situationships can stretch on indefinitely, existing in a state of perpetual emotional limbo.

Pop culture has played a major role in normalizing this dating trend. Songs by artists like Olivia Rodrigo, SZA, and Taylor Swift capture the frustrations of undefined relationships, while TikTok trends embrace “It’s Not That Deep” culture, where emotional detachment is framed as empowering. Meanwhile, dating apps like Hinge and Tinder have made it easier than ever to keep swiping for the next best option, reinforcing the idea that commitment is unnecessary when new people are always within reach. As a result, situationships have become less of an anomaly and more of an expected reality in university dating culture.

Why are situationships so common at McGill?

For many students, the lack of clear labels isn’t necessarily a bad thing — it’s a way to maintain flexibility without feeling tied down. University is a time of intense academic and personal growth, and committing to a relationship can feel like an added pressure rather than a source of support. Some students view relationships as a distraction, something that might interfere with their studies, social lives, or post-graduation plans. Others worry that defining a relationship too early could ruin the natural flow of things, leading them to keep things ambiguous for as long as possible.

Another major factor is hookup culture and the rise of casual dating. While McGill isn’t as party-driven as some other universities, the “no-strings-attached” attitude still influences how students approach romance. The convenience of dating apps makes it easy to meet people, but it also fosters a paradox of choice — why settle down when there are always more options? Ghosting, slow fades, and mixed signals have become common, reinforcing a culture where uncertainty is the norm.

But while situationships offer freedom and flexibility, they can also leave people feeling emotionally drained. Some students, however, say they work — as long as both people know what to expect. One student explained that they were currently in a situationship, describing how it allowed them to balance connection and independence.

“We’ve been seeing each other on and off for a few months. It’s nice because I don’t have time for a relationship but still crave intimacy and connection. It works because we have the same expectations for our situation, so we are able to enjoy each other’s presence while knowing that there’s no commitment — for now.”

Still, not everyone is convinced that situationships are worth the trouble. For some, they’re just a form of self-inflicted heartbreak waiting to happen.

“I’m in a situationship right now,” one student shared. “I know we like each other, but every time I bring up defining things, they get weird about it. So I just pretend I don’t care, but honestly, it sucks.”

The emotional toll: is this actually what students want?

At first glance, situationships might seem like an easy, low-risk alternative to traditional relationships. But many students admit that the lack of commitment creates more stress than it relieves. One student reflected on their personal experience, saying:

“My experience with situationships has been one of precarity. I find that they never end well. You go into them knowing that you might get hurt, but take the risk anyway, in the hopes that maybe it might become something more serious.”

Psychologists have found that ambiguity in relationships can lead to increased anxiety, as people are left constantly second-guessing where they stand. The fear of seeming “too needy” or “too intense” prevents many students from expressing their true feelings, resulting in a dynamic where no one is fully honest, but everyone is emotionally invested.

This emotional limbo can be exhausting. Students in situationships often act like they’re in relationships. They go on dates, text constantly, and rely on each other for emotional support — but they don’t receive the security that comes with commitment. This can lead to confusion, jealousy, and even heartbreak; especially when one person inevitably wants more than the other is willing to give. Some students describe it as a slow, inevitable disappointment, where they try to convince themselves they’re okay with casual dating, only to realize too late that they wanted something more.

One student put it more bluntly: “Don’t do them. Unless you’re super bored and heartbroken.”

The future of love at McGill: a shift back to relationships?

Despite the prevalence of situationships, there are signs that Gen Z is slowly moving back toward more serious relationships. Studies show that, following the pandemic, young people are tired of casual flings, with many craving deeper emotional connections. The exhaustion of constantly navigating undefined relationships has led some students to reject hookup culture in favor of something more meaningful.

At McGill, this shift is visible in the growing frustration that students express with situationships. Some are actively choosing to avoid them altogether, prioritizing emotional clarity over fleeting excitement. Others are still engaging in them, but with a critical awareness of their limitations. “I used to think situationships were fun,” a student admitted. “Now, I just think they’re a waste of time. If someone isn’t sure about me, I don’t want to waste my energy trying to convince them.”

So, is the end of labels here to stay, or is it just a phase? Maybe the reality is somewhere in between. Love isn’t disappearing — it’s just being rewritten. The way McGill students approach dating today might be different from previous generations, but at the core of it all, people still want the same things: connection, honesty, and the certainty that they matter to someone else.

The post Situationships and the End of Labels appeared first on The McGill Daily.

TikTok has been at the center of debates about data privacy, national security, and digital sovereignty. US lawmakers have long expressed concerns that ByteDance’s ties to the Chinese government could enable unauthorized access to American user data. While ByteDance has repeatedly denied these allegations, the platform’s rapid growth and cultural influence have made it a target of bipartisan scrutiny. The extension granted by Trump provides a brief reprieve, but it also raises questions about what’s next for TikTok and the broader implications for social media platforms operating globally.

The uncertainty surrounding TikTok’s fate has already triggered shifts in the social media landscape. Competitors like Instagram, YouTube Shorts, and Snapchat Spotlight are scrambling to attract TikTok’s displaced user base. Instagram, for instance, has introduced features like “Edits,” a video-editing app inspired by TikTok’s CapCut, and has expanded its video grid format to support longer videos — a clear attempt to capture the short-form video market.

Meanwhile, platforms like RedNote (known as Xiaohongshu in China) have positioned themselves as key alternatives. By emphasizing creativity and international cultural exchanges, RedNote has seen a surge in downloads, bolstered by its recruitment of American influencers to promote the app’s versatility.

TikTok’s challenges extend beyond business; they’ve become a symbol of the growing tension between the US and China. President Trump’s proposal for the US to hold a significant stake in TikTok highlights the app’s role in digital diplomacy. The platform’s uncertain future has even sparked renewed dialogue between the two nations, as Chinese President Xi Jinping emphasized the importance of cultural and technological exchanges. This unprecedented intersection of social media and geopolitics underscores how deeply intertwined these platforms have become with global relations.

While TikTok’s 75-day extension offers temporary relief, its future remains unclear. Whether through a partial divestment, a merger, or a complete shutdown, the next steps will have lasting consequences for users, creators, and the social media landscape at large. The TikTok saga also highlights the need for clearer global regulations around data privacy, as well as the challenges of balancing innovation with security.

Social media, like its users, is at a crossroads. TikTok’s fate will not only shape the future of short-form content but also serve as a case study in how nations navigate the complexities of technology, culture, and power in an increasingly connected world. For now, all eyes remain on the clock — and on what happens when those 75 days are up.

The post Tiktok’s Uncertain Future: Social Media at a Crossroads appeared first on The McGill Daily.

This year’s lineup solidifies Igloofest’s reputation as a global music destination. Heavy-hitters like Michael Bibi, Claptone, Apashe, Zeds Dead, Skepta (Más Tiempo), Bon Entendeur, Steve Angello, Adriatique, and Four Tet will take to the stage, bringing an eclectic mix of beats that range from house to bass-heavy anthems. For four weekends, the frozen expanse of the Old Port will transform into a high-energy playground for music lovers bundled up against the cold.

For families looking to join the fun, Igloofête offers a kid-friendly version of Igloofest on Saturday afternoons — January 18 and 25 and February 18, 2025 — at the Jacques-Cartier Pier. With free entrance, this magical winter playground features snow games, mini dance floors, and interactive performances perfect for children and parents alike. Families can enjoy snacks from the on-site snack bar, participate in friendly competitions, and enjoy amenities like lockers and indoor play areas to stay warm and comfortable.

The Igloovillage adds another layer to the festivities, offering art installations, warming stations, and a curated selection of local food vendors. This year, the festival has upped the ante with enhanced light displays and new interactive elements, giving attendees more reasons to explore between sets. These touches, alongside the immersive stage designs, show how Igloofest isn’t content to rest on its reputation — it keeps evolving to surprise its audience. And of course, the iconic Tackiest Snowsuit/Iglooswag Contest adds a dose of humor and creativity, with participants vying for prizes (and glory) in their boldest, most outrageous winter wear.

Montreal’s relationship with winter is what makes an event like Igloofest thrive. Instead of avoiding the season’s challenges, locals have turned them into a backdrop for creativity and community. Igloofest exemplifies this mindset, proving that even the harshest weather can’t dampen the city’s love for collective experiences. It’s no surprise that the festival draws visitors from across Canada and beyond, eager to see how Montreal transforms icy nights into a cultural event.

When it comes to enjoying Igloofest, dressing smartly is key to staying warm and embracing the fun. Start with a moisture-wicking base layer, add a fleece or wool mid-layer for insulation, and finish with a waterproof, windproof jacket to tackle the elements. Protect your extremities with a thermal hat, insulated gloves, and warm socks, and opt for waterproof boots with good traction to navigate icy grounds.

For those planning to attend, Igloofest offers ticket options ranging from General Admission to VIP packages, which include heated lounges and premium viewing spots. The festival’s accessibility and diverse programming make it appealing to a wide audience, whether they’re die-hard electronic music fans or simply curious about what it’s like to embrace the cold, Montreal-style.

As Montreal braces for another round of winter’s worst, Igloofest reminds us why the city stands out. It’s not just the music, the lights, or even the quirky snowsuits — it’s the attitude. In Montreal, winter isn’t endured; it’s celebrated. And that’s the kind of energy that keeps people coming back, year after year.

The post Igloofest 2025: Montreal’s Winter Celebration appeared first on The McGill Daily.

California’s arid terrain and sweltering summers have long made it a hotspot for wildfires, but their severity has escalated in recent years. The Palisades Fire has already burned through over 17,000 acres, while the Eaton Fire has torched 14,000 more. Extended droughts, unprecedented heatwaves, and erratic weather patterns have dried out vegetation, transforming it into highly flammable fuel. Adding to the challenge, the notorious Santa Ana winds, with gusts exceeding 160 kph, have propelled the flames, making efforts to control the blazes futile.

Ongoing investigations reveal a combination of natural and human causes to the fires. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has been looking into possible human involvement, adding another layer of unpredictability. Investigators are looking into potential cases of arson and accidental ignitions, as downed power lines and construction sparks have come under scrutiny.

The cost — both human and economic — is staggering. With damages expected to surpass 250 billion USD, this disaster ranks among the most expensive in U.S. history. Families forced to flee with little warning face not just the loss of their homes but an uncertain path forward. Overcrowded shelters offer temporary relief, while local authorities are scrambling to provide financial aid and recovery programs. The fires have ravaged neighborhoods, wiped out critical infrastructure, and decimated wildlife habitats, leaving a scorched void in their wake.

Amid the destruction, acts of resilience and generosity stand out. Grassroots organizations, volunteers, and nonprofits have mobilized quickly, providing essential supplies, medical aid, and emotional support for those in need. Neighboring states and even international aid groups have stepped in, highlighting how collective action can bring relief during overwhelming crises. Donations, both large and small, are pouring across the world, showing that in moments of destruction, communities still find ways to support one another.

However, these fires are more than isolated tragedies: they’re part of a feedback loop fueled by climate change. Wildfires release massive amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, accelerating global warming and increasing the likelihood of future fires. This self-perpetuating cycle is a dire warning that systemic changes are long overdue. Improved forest management, stricter building codes in fire-prone areas, and transitioning to renewable energy are essential steps to breaking the cycle.

Beyond the environmental costs, the mental and emotional toll of these disasters often goes unspoken. Displaced families face not only the loss of their homes and all of their possessions, but also the uncertainty of starting over. First responders work tirelessly, often at great personal risk, to contain these fires and help residents find safety, yet they too bear the burden of trauma. Calls for better mental health support in disaster recovery plans are growing louder, emphasizing that rebuilding goes beyond bricks and mortar.

These fires also spotlight glaring gaps in infrastructure and policy. Critics argue that outdated building codes, insufficient funding for prevention programs, and corporate negligence have left communities more vulnerable. Utility companies, in particular, are under scrutiny for their role in sparking past blazes, with legal battles over accountability expected to shape future policies.

Wildfires don’t just burn forests — they upend lives, leaving scars on landscapes and communities alike. As smoke fills the Los Angeles sky, the question remains: How many more warnings will it take until it’s too late? Whether these fires become an annual disaster or a sobering turning point depends on what is done next.

The post How Los Angeles Wildfires Showcase Climate Change and Community Action appeared first on The McGill Daily.

Traditional methods like dieting and exercise, while important, don’t always work in the long term for everyone. Bariatric surgery, though effective, is expensive and invasive, and not an option for most people. That’s where a new type of treatment — GLP-1 receptor agonists — comes in, offering a fresh approach to tackling obesity.

GLP-1 receptor agonists are medications that work by mimicking glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), a hormone in the body that controls hunger. This helps people feel full for longer by reducing cravings and slowing down how quickly food leaves the stomach. This combination makes it easier to eat less and gradually lose excess body fat. These medications were originally designed to help people with diabetes, but researchers soon noticed their potential to aid weight loss even for those without the condition.

McGill University is at the forefront of this promising topic of research. In a major study, McGill researchers reviewed data from 26 randomized controlled trials involving over 15,000 people who were overweight or obese but did not have other significant health issues, such as diabetes. The results were striking: participants using GLP-1 medications, over the course of 12 to 18 months, lost a significant amount of weight, often between 15–20 per cent of their total body weight. One such new medication, retratrutride, showed shocking success with some participants losing up to 22 per cent of their weight after 48 weeks of weekly treatments.

Alongside weight loss, the study highlighted other health benefits of the treatment. GLP-1 receptor agonists improved metabolic health markers like blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and cardiovascular outcomes, reducing the risk of heart attacks, strokes, and heart failure. By alleviating strain on the heart and preventing arterial plaque buildup, these therapies could help address the serious health risks often tied to obesity. According to a report by McGill’s Office for Science and Society, these treatments could also shift the narrative around obesity, emphasizing its biological roots rather than placing responsibility solely on the individual.

While this breakthrough could revolutionize obesity treatment, there remain many challenges to consider. As highlighted in a discussion on the McGill Journal of Medicine podcast, questions about affordability and long-term safety are key areas of this study that require further research. These cutting-edge medications are expensive, making them inaccessible to many people who could benefit from them. Obesity tends to affect lower-income groups more, and without changes in healthcare policies on medication pricing, these treatments may not reach the people who need them most. Moreover, obesity is a chronic condition, which requires long-term treatment. The side effects of using these medications over the span of decades are still being studied.

There is also the need to balance this medical breakthrough with broader societal changes. Medications like GLP-1 can be life-changing, but they are not a standalone solution to obesity. Issues like access to affordable healthy food, better education about nutrition, and tackling the stigma around obesity must remain part of the conversation – and they should come first to reduce the risk factors of developing the condition in the first place. GLP-1 therapies, as a treatment rather than a preventative measure, should be seen as one tool among many in a much larger effort to improve public health.

McGill’s research into GLP-1 medications represents an important step forward in addressing obesity. By investigating whether these novel treatments are safe and effective, the university is helping to pave the way for a future where obesity can be managed with the same care, precision, and social understanding as any other health condition.

This isn’t just about science — it’s about changing lives. For millions of people struggling with obesity, McGill’s research offers hope that real, lasting solutions are on the horizon.

The post Breaking Ground in Obesity Research: McGill’s Role in GLP-1 Therapies appeared first on The McGill Daily.

For Montrealers, snow removal is part of the rhythm of winter life. It’s the steady hum of plows at 3:00 a.m., the towering piles of snow at street corners, and the icy sidewalks that still somehow evade city crews. But behind the scenes of this carefully choreographed chaos lies a city grappling with mounting costs, environmental fallout, and an unpredictable future shaped by climate change.

Every winter storm triggers a city-wide operation, mobilizing thousands of workers and an army of machinery. Over 10,000 kilometers of streets and sidewalks must be cleared. But this isn’t just about shovels and salt — it’s about logistics on a grand scale. Trucks cart snow to dumping sites where it’s piled into mountains taller than most buildings, and the effort requires constant coordination to avoid bottlenecks and delays.

What’s the cost of this snowy dance? It’s not just the hefty annual price tag. Road salt, a staple of snow and ice management, seeps into the soil and waterways, disrupting ecosystems and contaminating local vegetation. Then there’s the waste left behind — oil, metals, and plastic particles trapped in the snow that ends up dumped into the environment.

But the biggest threat to Montreal’s snow strategy isn’t the snow itself — it’s how the snow is changing. Climate change is rewriting the rules of winter. While total snowfall might decrease in the long run, the snow we do get is arriving in shorter, fiercer bursts. And it’s no longer just snow: freeze-thaw cycles are creating ice sheets that are tougher to clear and even harder to manage.

The city has started testing new ways to handle the pressure. Electric snow plows are rolling through neighborhoods as part of a pilot program to cut emissions. Scientists are experimenting with eco-friendly alternatives to salt. Advanced weather modeling systems are being used to predict storms more accurately, saving time and resources. These steps are promising, but they’re also just that — steps. The question remains: how effective are these methods compared to what is currently used? Can they scale up to meet the demands of Montreal’s massive snow removal operations or are they destined to remain small-scale solutions? How will they reshape the city’s ability to handle increasingly unpredictable winters?

For McGill students, this battle with snow is both a background story and a reality check. It’s about navigating campus during a storm, slipping on icy paths between classes, and realizing that the snow piles you climb over were part of a $200 million effort to make the city livable. But it’s also a chance to see how a city adapts to problems as big as the weather itself.

Maybe this is where the twist lies. Montreal’s snow removal isn’t just a story of trucks and salt. It’s about resilience, adaptation, and finding creative ways to handle challenges that cities everywhere will face as the climate continues to change. It’s a reminder that even something as mundane as clearing snow can reflect how a city fights to stay connected and move forward.

As winter rolls on, one thing is clear: Montreal isn’t backing down from its snowy foe. And in its determination, it’s carving out a blueprint for how cities can turn a battle with the elements into a story of innovation and survival.

The post Montreal’s Snow Wars: When the City Fights Winter appeared first on The McGill Daily.

At McGill, on October 5th, Students for Palestine’s Honour and Resistance (SPHR) organized a rally at Roddick Gates to emphasize the urgency of solidarity and action for Palestine. These demonstrators joined a Montreal-wide protest at Place des Arts, rallying for Palestinian rights and collaborating with organizations like the Palestinian Youth Movement and ANSWER Coalition, among others.

Hundreds attended the protest outside of campus, bringing to light the number of students advocating for Palestinian rights against Israel’s violence and calling for change from the McGill administration. A counter-protest in support of Israel added to the tense environment, demonstrating the divided opinions on campus. As violence in Gaza has escalated, McGill has seen a surge in student activism – further fueled by the recent violence in Lebanon. From September 11 to October 1 of 2023, the McGill Board of Governors’ Committee on Sustainability and Social Responsibility (CSSR) invited community input on divestment from military-linked companies through a webform. Many students and groups such as SPHR viewed the CSSR’s invitation for community input as a superficial gesture, reflecting institutional resistance to meaningful action on social justice issues, especially given that McGill had previously initiated similar surveys without making concrete commitments to divestment. A student referendum from Fall 2023 showed 79 per cent support for the University’s divestment. This said, the administration’s injunction to prevent the policy’s ratification has only bolstered activists’ resolve.

The encampment on campus at the end of last semester highlighted strong resistance to McGill’s ties to military corporations, prompting intensified discussions on divestment and student opinions regarding the administration’s response. This encampment was established on campus for 75 days throughout the summer, rallying for Palestinian rights, until it was forcibly dismantled by police and private security hired by the university.

Social media, especially Instagram, has been pivotal for student activist groups like SPHR in spreading information about protests and rallying support on campus. Platforms like Instagram allow these groups to share updates, testimonials, and calls to action, amplifying their message within the McGill community and beyond. Hashtags like #PalestinianRights have broadened visibility, empowering activists to critique Western media narratives and address concerns about transparency. Support from groups such as the McGill Indigenous Student Alliance, Independent Jewish Voices McGill, and Divest McGill have further boosted visibility, demonstrating how solidarity among different movements on campus amplifies engagement for the Palestinian cause and strengthens the sense of community.

National and international student organizations called for a “Week of Rage” from October 7 to 11, encouraging students to walk out, rally, and disrupt classes in support of Palestinian justice. Many viewed participation as a moral obligation, framing it as essential for awareness. In response, McGill sought an injunction from the Quebec Superior Court against SPHR, granted on October 8, restricting protests near university entrances. McGill’s actions exemplify how institutions respond to student activism with legal measures, galvanizing activists further in their calls for accountability.

McGill’s Deputy Provost Angela Campbell and Vice-President Fabrice Labeau voiced concern and support for students’ protest rights, while simultaneously framing the injunction as necessary to maintain academic integrity. This mirrors broader trends across North America, where university administrations are balancing support for student activism with enforcing institutional policies. On October 7, protests also erupted at several universities in the U.S. Students from institutions including Columbia University, UC Berkeley, and others voiced opposition to administrative decisions they saw as hindrances to justice-oriented movements. At Columbia, students rallied in support of Palestinian rights, urging the administration to take a stronger stance. Similarly, at UC Berkeley, students expressed frustration with perceived inaction by their leadership, highlighting a shared tension across campuses as students continue to advocate for social justice causes despite institutional challenges.

Over the past year, student protests have highlighted a growing commitment to social justice, often in alignment with broader global movements. At McGill, organizations like SPHR have worked to sustain this momentum by collaborating with faculty initiatives such as Profs4Palestine to host public discussions and conferences. These efforts echo actions at other campuses, where student groups have united under the shared goal of advocating for Palestinian rights as part of a larger push for global justice. One activist remarked to the Daily that “being here today is about standing up for justice and showing that we won’t be silent.”

The post Student Activist Efforts A Year After October 7th appeared first on The McGill Daily.

The series kicked off on October 21 with a free community dinner at SSMU’s Flex Space, catered by the Midnight Kitchen Collective. As a casual introduction to the deeper discussions and activities of the week, attendees gathered to share a vegan meal – an informal opportunity for participants to connect with each other before the week’s more structured workshops. Those attending – whether long-time activists or newcomers to the space – expressed a shared enthusiasm for working toward tangible social change. Organic discussion of topics like migrant justice, Indigenous rights, and the history of radical movements in Montreal fostered a strong sense of community, underscoring the significance of informal spaces in movement-building.

One of the most anticipated workshops of the week was held on October 23, titled “How to Design an Effective Political Image.” Hosted at QPIRG-Concordia, the seminar taught participants the principles of impactful design as a form of protest. Led by facilitators from the International Development Studies Students Association (IDSSA), SSMU External Affairs, and QPIRG-McGill, the workshop began by exploring how images function as powerful tools in political movements by shaping narratives and evoking emotion to engage and mobilize the public. Attendees learned the basics of composition, colour theory, and symbolism — elements critical to political imagery. The seminar also covered practical techniques like spray-painting and wheat-pasting, offering hands-on guidance in producing and disseminating these images.

The session emphasized how political imagery must be both bold and accessible as a visual call to action. The discussion of real-world examples, from historical posters to contemporary protest art, provided a rich context for understanding how art and activism intertwine.

For those who missed the initial events, the remainder of Culture Shock 2024 offers a diverse lineup aimed at educating and empowering participants. Other highlights from the first week included the Radical Walking Tour of Milton-Parc, on October 22, exploring the neighborhood’s history of activism and its ties to McGill, as well as the Intro to Canadian Imperialism workshop led by Professor Tyler Shipley on October 24, diving into Canada’s colonial past and its lasting effects on global politics. In addition, on October 25, participants joined the Zine-Making Workshop led by volunteers from the Prisoner Correspondence Project, which focuses on the significance of zines in leftist movements.

The second week brings even more opportunities for engagement. The Panel on the History of Montreal Activism will take place on October 28, gathering speakers from various grassroots organizations to discuss the city’s rich legacy of anti-imperialism and community organizing. On October 29, a second Radical Walking Tour is scheduled, meeting at QPIRG-McGill (3516 Parc Ave.), while Lupa ay Buhay (Land is Life) will be held the same evening. Participants can also look forward to the CKUTea x Music Lib Listening Party on November 1, rounding out the week’s activities. Each of these events offers unique opportunities to engage with critical issues and gain practical tools for activism.

Culture Shock 2024 positions itself as a vital part of the ongoing conversation around social justice at McGill University and in the wider Montreal community. Through its diverse programming, the event series has not only educated participants but also fostered spaces for solidarity and action. Whether building community while creating powerful art or bonding over a shared meal, the series demonstrates that transformation begins when individuals come together with a collective purpose, equipping participants with practical skills, meaningful connections, and the inspiration needed to drive real change.

For upcoming Culture Shock events, check out @qpirgmcgill on Instagram or qpirgmcgill.org/cs/.

The post Culture Shock 2024 appeared first on The McGill Daily.

This guide is the product of a two-year collaboration between the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and Equal Rights Trust, with their joint OHCHR Technical Anti-Discrimination Law Development Mission to address Costa Rica. Written by experts Claude Cahn (OHCHR), Jim Fitzgerald (Director, Equal Rights Trust), and UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, Nazila Ghanea, the guide focuses on establishing international standards for legislation on equality. It offers clear, actionable steps for lawmakers and human rights defenders alike to draft and enforce more comprehensive anti-discrimination policies.

The origins of globally comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation can be traced back to post-World War II efforts, most notably the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in 1948. While not legally binding, the UDHR was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly and represents a global commitment to human rights, influencing national and international law worldwide. Article 2 of the Declaration explicitly prohibits discrimination on several grounds, laying the foundation for national and regional efforts to codify protections; and though its principles are universal, countries are encouraged to incorporate these protections into their legal systems. For instance, the 2000 Equality Directive in the European Union and South Africa’s Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act of 2000 stand as key examples of national responses that have furthered the principles laid out in the UN’s new Anti-Discrimination legislation and guideline.

The release of the OHCHR’s Guide comes at a time when discrimination and inequality remain pervasive in many regions of the world. While several countries, such as Canada, known for its progressive LGBTQ+ rights; Argentina, which has advanced gender equality and same-sex marriage; and Portugal, recognized for its comprehensive anti-discrimination laws, have made strides in enacting equality laws, many others are still struggling to protect minorities and marginalized groups from both incidental and systemic discrimination. The guide provides detailed insights into these challenges, offering best practices from countries that have successfully implemented comprehensive legal frameworks.

The release of the guide also comes amid a wave of recent anti-discrimination initiatives across the globe. In early 2024, Germany passed its first comprehensive federal law addressing discrimination in the workplace, specifically aimed at preventing bias against women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and people with disabilities. Similarly, Chile’s parliament is currently debating new legislation to address racial and indigenous discrimination, while Canada has seen renewed discussions on tightening existing anti-discrimination laws as part of an ongoing review of its Human Rights Act.

However, despite these developments, many countries face significant obstacles in enforcing these laws. For instance, in the U.S., enforcement of anti-discrimination protections has come under scrutiny from those who see the issue as an extension of the political division throughout the country, leading to many states rolling back protection for transgender individuals in schools and workplaces. Similarly, South Africa, while having one of the most progressive sets of equality laws, continues to grapple with enforcement issues, especially in rural areas where access to justice can be limited.

According to its authors, the guide is “an essential tool for policymakers working to dismantle discriminatory systems that disproportionately impact vulnerable communities.” They highlight how the guide examines international legal standards to provide practical examples of legislation from around the world, helping governments adapt and tailor anti-discrimination laws to their specific populations.

The guide also outlines several key principles essential for creating effective anti-discrimination laws, including prohibitions against direct and indirect discrimination, harassment, and victimization. It emphasizes the need for reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities and other protected groups, aiming to ensure their equal participation in public life without undue burden. It further draws attention to the importance of enforcement mechanisms, encouraging the creation of independent bodies to investigate complaints and impose sanctions on discriminatory practices. The authors pointed out that “strong enforcement is critical to ensuring that anti-discrimination laws are not just symbolic but result in real-world change.”

Ultimately, this guide stresses the importance of international cooperation in combating discrimination. Collaboration between governments, civil society organizations, and international bodies is essential to sharing knowledge and addressing the cross-border pervasion of inequality. It also points out that despite the progress made, the journey toward global legislative equality is far from over, with many legal frameworks still lacking sufficient scope or mechanisms for enforcement. With the global rise of radically conservative movements and increasing polarization, the contribution to comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation is more urgent than perhaps ever before.

The post UN Guide Revolutionizes Anti-Discrimination Laws appeared first on The McGill Daily.

According to a report from the Angus Reid Institute, “two-thirds of Canadians are concerned American democracy will not be able to survive another four years of Trump at the helm,” highlighting the deep apprehension across the world about the outcomes of this year’s election. The interconnected nature of our economies implies that changes in U.S. trade policies or tariffs can directly impact job prospects and market conditions for Canadians. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce emphasizes that “Canada and the United States share one of the largest trading relationships in the world,” contextualizing the importance of understanding potential changes.

U.S. immigration and foreign policies can influence Canada’s immigration system, which affect international students and refugees. On a cultural level, shifts in U.S. social policies, such as changes in LGBTQ+ rights, reproductive healthcare, or racial justice, can resonate across the border, influencing Canadian perspectives and societal norms. Some McGill students have voiced concerns about how these shifts could impact social movements here in Canada.

Mary* remarked: “If the U.S. starts rolling back rights for marginalized groups, it might embolden similar movements in Canada, which worries me as someone active in campus advocacy.”

“I’ve seen how U.S. trends, like social justice movements, influence activism on our campus, and I expect that to continue with this election,” Chris* noted. For McGill students, understanding these dynamics is crucial as they shape both the broader socio-political landscape and the students’ academic and professional futures. These economic disruptions could further influence job markets in Canada, potentially affecting where students see future job opportunities and shaping their career decisions post-graduation.

As McGill students face rising tuition fees and grapple with social justice issues, the implications of the U.S. election become even more pertinent. Changes in U.S. policies can influence global economic conditions, which in turn could affect Canadian funding for higher education and job prospects for graduates. For instance, if U.S. trade policies impact Canadian industries, such as energy and technology, this could directly affect job markets and career opportunities for students in fields like business and economics.

U.S. policy changes resulting from the upcoming election could have significant consequences for immigration, LGBTQ+ rights, and other social justice causes, potentially leading to heightened discrimination or reduced support for asylum seekers and refugees across North America. Similarly, shifts in LGBTQ+ rights policies might undermine protections or roll back rights gains, impacting community support and advocacy efforts in Canada. These changes could influence Canadian policies and attitudes, with direct implications for students involved in related advocacy on campus. At McGill University, international students and campus groups dedicated to social justice are particularly affected, as the uncertainty regarding their status or future prospects could disrupt both academic and personal lives. Campus organizations advocating for LGBTQ+ rights or supporting marginalized communities may need to adapt their strategies in response to these shifting policies.

If the U.S. implements more restrictive immigration policies, Canada might experience an influx of asylum seekers seeking refuge from tightening conditions south of the border. This potential surge could place additional pressure on Canada’s immigration system and prompt policy shifts to manage increased demand. Consequently, changes in how Canada processes asylum claims and integrates newcomers could affect everything from immigration legislation to support services for refugees, influencing the experiences of students engaged in these areas.

Moreover, changes in U.S. trade policies, such as the imposition of new tariffs or shifts in energy regulations, could have significant repercussions for the Canadian economy. Increased trade protectionism could translate into tariffs on Canadian exports that might reduce access to the U.S. market, affecting key industries like manufacturing and agriculture, which could lead to job losses and slower economic growth. This economic uncertainty directly impacts students, particularly those studying business or economics, by influencing market dynamics, investment opportunities, and career prospects.

The economic relationship between Canada and the U.S. has deep roots. The 1980s saw Canada moving toward deeper economic integration with the U.S., culminating in the Canada- U.S. Free Trade Agreement (FTA) of 1988, marking a shift from previous nationalist policies to a more open, globalized economic stance. By 1999, the U.S. accounted for 67 per cent Canadian merchandise exports and 87 per cent of exports, underscoring the significance of this partnership.

The outcome of the U.S. election could have profound implications for global democracy. The intimate and significant cross- border relationship between Canada and the U.S. highlights the stakes involved: Canadians are closely watching the U.S. election, with some expressing disbelief at the possibility of Trump returning to office. Over one million Americans reside in Canada and with many of them now preparing to vote by absentee ballot, the upcoming election has already shown its ripple effect across the border.

The McGill Pre-Law Student Society held a watch party for the U.S. presidential debates held on September 9. Mary said, “Even though the U.S. is Canada’s closest ally, we’re starting to see a real split in social norms between the two countries. At the same time, conservative values have been gaining more ground here in Canada too, which is making the political landscape a lot more divided than it used to be.” While the U.S. remains highly involved in foreign policy, some of the protectionist economic policies being proposed could impact international cooperation on trade and other global issues, potentially reshaping the global balance of power.

Canada’s role in global organizations such as the United Nations and NATO could shift in response to U.S. foreign policy changes, and these shifts are likely to spark reactions among Canadian students and within cultural discourse. If the U.S. becomes more isolationist or adopts unilateral policies, students engaged in international relations or advocacy at McGill are likely to push for Canada to take on a stronger leadership role in promoting global cooperation. When asked for opinions on the matter, a political science student said, “With the U.S. kind of pulling back, Canada’s got to step up more, whether that’s with peacekeeping or playing a bigger role in NATO.” These changes will likely spark conversations on campus once the elections happen, as students start to think more about Canada’s role in global security and diplomacy.

To stay actively engaged, Canadian students should seek out opportunities to participate in political discussions and join advocacy groups that align with their interests. Attending campus events, debates, or lectures on international politics can provide valuable insights and foster a deeper understanding of how global issues impact local realities. Additionally, getting involved with student organizations or advocacy groups focused on social justice, immigration, or global democracy can drive meaningful change both on campus and beyond. For those eligible to vote in U.S. elections, it’s also important to exercise that right, even from abroad. Organizations like Democrats Abroad @ McGill make it easier for U.S. students to cast their ballots and participate in the democratic process.

*All names have been edited to preserve anonymity.

The post The Looming Impact of the Upcoming U.S. Election on Canada appeared first on The McGill Daily.