During the course of the festival, organizers expected millions of people to engage with the jazz festival online. According to Laurence Beauchamp, the festival social media manager, the festival’s website received 1.7 million views before the festival began. Organizers hoped that even more people will use the website during the festival to look up shows, get news about the festival, and explore the Quartier des Spectacles. Their new mobile-friendly website in particular attracted many online visitors.

“Last year’s site was not user-friendly on mobile devices,” said Beauchamp. This year, for the first time, the Jazz Festival’s website had a separate layout for mobile devices. The new layout made the website easier for festival-goers to navigate on smartphones and tablets. The festival website team’s effort was, thus, rewarded with more page views. According to Beauchamp, the website received 60,000 views from mobile devices this year, significantly more than the 35,000 visits last year.

The festival also made significant improvements to its smartphone application.  Last year, the app was installed on 65,000 Apple devices. Beauchamp said this year is the first year that the Jazz Festival app was also available for Android devices. While Beauchamp cited Twitter and Facebook as the two most important social media platforms for the festival, she noted that “the mobile app is the festival-goers’ main tool to get around the festival site.” The app was developed by Greencopper, a Montreal-based company that also developed the Francofolies and Nuit Blanche apps. “The design has changed a lot, it’s really more practical and playful,” Beauchamp said.

Beyond design tweaks, additional functions were added. The new link with Facebook provides suggestions about which shows to attend if a user links a Facebook account with the app.

Both the online and physical environment of the Jazz Festival have evolved to cater to mobile devices. Free wifi has been available at the Quartier des Spectacles for a few years, and people are taking full advantage of it. Beauchamp said that the Wi-Fi network is usually stable and strong, but can be overwhelmed during popular events when lots of devices are connected.

Dozens of smartphones could be seen at the festival grounds during the first weekend, but people know that the dim blue light from a screen may not always be welcome. Blocking someone else’s view to take pictures or video with a smartphone was considered rude by many tourists. “I guess it depends on how disruptive it is,” said Dana Connell, a tourist at the festival. “If they’re not making noise and it’s really dark and I can’t really tell, they can do what they want.”

Others tourists said that while they enjoyed sharing their experiences with family and friends on social media, using their mobile device to document a concert negatively impacted their experience. “You’re there at something live and you’re looking at it through the filter of a screen,” one tourist, Kathy Booth, said.

While mobile devices can both improve and hinder the concert experience, it appears they are here to stay and are becoming a concert tradition for a new generation of concert-goers. “Back in the day, back in the [19]70s, you used to have people do lighters at concerts,” said Greg, a tourist from New Hampshire. “Now, you have smartphones.”

The post The Jazz Festival goes mobile appeared first on The McGill Daily.

Members of the MSURJ editorial board discussed the “Publish or Perish” article in depth. Given that publishing and promoting undergraduate research is the journal’s mandate and a personal passion, I felt compelled to respond further.

Mouri states in “Publish or Perish?” that a successful undergraduate research experience results from the undergraduate being integrated into the “fabric of the lab” – something that I have experienced and benefited from. I am constantly reminded about how lucky I was to find not only a lab that was doing work that I could become passionate about, but one that was also truly willing to integrate another undergraduate into their existing team. My experience in the lab would not be as positive as it is if I were just ‘Undergrad #3’ instead of ‘Kate, who has been tracing dendritic arbours,’ or if my lab-mates hadn’t spent time while waiting for incubations chatting with me like I was a peer.

However, a truly successful experience should also give undergraduates a door to the wider scientific community – and like it or not, joining the wider community is best achieved through presentations and publications. If undergraduates have done good work (as many have done – just look at our previous authors), they should be encouraged to share it with the world. As quoted by Mouri in the aforementioned article, Undergraduate Research Officer Victor Chisholm said: “When you’re in the lab, you’re participating in the creation of new knowledge.” The creation of new knowledge in research means results, and results – even undergraduate results – are meant to be shared and reviewed by others. Publishing is both a part of the scientific process and a part of the life of a scientist – being able to communicate one’s passion and knowledge about science is an important component of research. To fully experience what it means to work in a lab, undergraduates should take the time and do the work – some of it long and tedious – to put together a paper that is up to peer review.

I hate the idea that people might think the work I do as an editor, and the work MSURJ does as a journal, is part of a system that puts undue pressure on undergraduates to publish; that is not why MSURJ exists. I believe the original author and I (and, of course, MSURJ) share many of the same goals – undergraduates should have the kind of experiences in the lab that enrich their education and fuel their passion for their field, without being pressured to publish. However, I would caution those who seek to reduce the emphasis placed on publications for undergraduates to ensure they don’t end up underemphasizing them instead. While publications should absolutely not be the only goal of research, the value of undergraduate publications cannot be understated or dismissed as a part of an unnecessary trend. But hey – I might be biased.

Kate Sheridan is a senior editor for the McGill Science Undergraduate Research Journal and a U2 Cognitive Science student. She can be reached at kathleen.sheridan@mail.mcgill.ca.

The post Publish or perish? Perish the thought appeared first on The McGill Daily.