NewsCommentaryCultureFeaturesScitechMindnbodyCompendiumBlogs

Electric cars to die by dehydration?

The road to cheap electric cars could be bumpy in places

Jackie Grom
Science and Technology Writer

They’re quiet, stylish, and don’t belch noxious smoke. They’re retro-futuristic. They’re even fast.

Electric cars are set to finally come into their own. Instead of stopping at the gas pump in the dead of winter to fill up, we could soon just pull into the garage and plug in. Although the electric car supposedly kicked the bucket in the seventies, steady advances in technology suggest that the electric car is about to undergo a resurrection – but it will not be without challenges.

In today’s climate of high and volatile oil prices, the affordability and stability of the electric car is driving interest in the technology. The electrical energy equivalent of gasoline would cost between 25 and 75 cents per gallon, compared to prices of over a dollar per gallon for gasoline.

Cost isn’t the only advantage. According to Paul Denholm, a Senior Energy Analyst at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, plug-in technology would also play a part in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

“If you charge your car from coal-powered systems, the emissions are about the same, but anything better than a 100 per cent coal electric generator will do better than gasoline,” he says.

Using electricity from natural gas-fired plants reduces overall carbon dioxide emissions by about one-half, and renewable energy-generated electricity would cut emissions close to zero. In a place like Quebec, where hydropower dominates, emissions reduction would be significant.

Today’s plug-in electric hybrid vehicles are similar to the standard hybrid vehicles currently on the road, but the power they get from plugging in allows them to use electricity for 40 to 80 kilometers before kicking into an efficient combination of combustion and electric energy for longer trips. Matthew Stevens, a Chemical Engineering doctoral student at University of Waterloo, says this kind of technology can provide almost 200 kilometers per gallon for long-distance driving, and even more for shorter commutes.

“If you are driving 20 miles per day, you’re talking months between fill-ups,” he says.

But a report published in the June issue of Environmental Science & Technology reveals a hidden cost: electric cars use a lot of water. Because water is used in power generation and for cooling, a global switch to electric vehicles would send water usage through the roof. Every electric mile would require about 20 times more water than a gasoline mile.

The good news is that 85 per cent of that water can be recovered in the power plants and cooling systems that generate and transport the energy. But few countries have the abundance of water that Canada does. Carey King, a postdoctorate fellow at the Bureau of Economic Geology, and Michael Webber, Associate Director of the Center for International Energy and Environmental Policy – both from the University of Texas at Austin and authors of the report – say that the increase in water use may not seem like much, but for areas with water scarcity like the U.S. Southwest, it’s likely to pose a problem.

In spite of the water problems, Webber claims that electric cars are a step in the right direction, because they make mitigating environmental impacts a manageable challenge by consolidating emissions to power plants.

“It shifts the impacts from the car to the power plants, and the power plants have pollution impacts, water impacts, land impacts, and greenhouse gas impacts,” he says. “Overall those impacts will be smaller than what we’re doing with gasoline combustible-engine cars. It’s much easier to control those impacts at 1,500 power plants than 200 million automobiles.”

There is a lot to be gained from the introduction of plug-in vehicles to the market, and according to Webber, while some regions will struggle with the increased water usage, most regions won’t.

“We care [about water demand] if there’s a water scarcity issue, but there are a lot of water-rich parts of the [United States] where it doesn’t really matter,” he says.

More importantly, Webber adds, the study gives a heads up to policy makers to start preparing for the increase in water consumption.

“If we are worried about water, we need to go to electricity systems that don’t need water, or we need to go to cooling systems that don’t need water,” he says.

Printer Friendly Version

Comments

kent beuchert wrote:

I've got news , folks. The world will always need more electricity whether it's for electric cars or electric fans. And newer alternative energies such as solar don't use any appreciable amounts of water to produce power, and if you are worried about water usage, I'd worry about what growing corn for ethanol is doing. The least problem we have is the need for water. If it comes down to it, water can be easily pumped in from the ocean to cool any power plants. It just hasn't been a significant factor in the past to bother.

Apr 07 at 06:29 PM

Flag as inappropriate


Don W Baird wrote:

The accompanying article is an example of the poletical resistance (from oil interests) who are undoubtedly behind such articles. They always ignore the sunlight going to waste. Just putting photoelectric panels on a property to easily charge battery banks which can be swapped in a driveway into an electric car having all the internal combustion guts removed and an aluminum plate to receive and to replace an exhausted battery bank will solve our polution problems.

Apr 08 at 12:58 AM

Flag as inappropriate


John Spradley wrote:

The solar panels that charge my 100% pure electric car are the first to collect frost and dew here in Southern California. Our vegetable garden benefits from the runoff. Our air conditioner in the summer drips about 8 gallons of water which waters our car's batteries and garden. Our electric car and its charging system actually reduce our water needs.

Apr 10 at 09:09 AM

Flag as inappropriate


Greg Coleman wrote:

Most people waste more water, just running the hot water faucet, when washing their hands than my electric car will use in a year. Water use is probably the least of the concerns over elctric cars....

Apr 10 at 01:31 PM

Flag as inappropriate


Keith wrote:

In China where most of the electrical power comes from coal they use the waste heat from power generation to heat millions of homes with "central water heating". In United States if the power plants were to adopt the same system they could have another source of income and not use extra water for the steam condensers. Open your minds to the possibilities , there is more than one way to skin the cat.

Apr 11 at 05:06 AM

Flag as inappropriate


Anish wrote:

Don--not to try to burst your bubble, but at the moment, photovoltaic cells use more energy to make than they produce over their lifetime, not to mention the major heavy metal byproducts (it become useful in large plants with reflector/collector mirrors)...it isn't some massive political conspiracy

Keith--That may be contributing to the reason why many of China's major rivers never make it to the ocean

This development of electric cars is awesome---even if dirty power production methods are used to make the electricity, the efficiencies of scale make it worth it ecologically

Apr 15 at 03:12 PM

Flag as inappropriate


Kevin wrote:

Anish - could you provide support for the assertion PV cells cost more energy to manufacture than they produce in their lifetime? I can't find that information anywhere? Not saying it isn't true just I can't find the supporting information. Also the heavy element pollution you mention too? So many categoric statements get banded about without evidence and I am trying to get some fact established from fiction ;-)

I agree that intense manufacturing and power generation probably take too much water from Chinese water systems in many regions but that will ultimately be self limiting though incur long term damage to eco-systems.

Overall, electric offers a range of generation methods that can be selected to suit the local resources more effectively than oil based propulsion. Long term I would expect this to be cheaper and/or offer more control over emissions.

May 30 at 10:14 AM

Flag as inappropriate


Post a Comment